The AEC is responsible for the administration and regulation of Australia’s electoral system. To ensure activities relating to federal electoral events and referendums are compliant with the relevant legislation, Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 and Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984, the AEC undertakes compliance and enforcement activities as per our Regulatory Action Policy.
This page sets out the AEC’s compliance and enforcement actions. An annual summary of significant enforcement activities is also in the AEC Annual Report.
During electoral and referendum events, the AEC can send warnings to people or entities who do not properly authorise certain electoral or referendum matter. Communications containing electoral or referendum matter that must be authorised include:
For more information about the authorisation requirements see Electoral Backgrounder: Electoral and referendum communications and authorisation requirements.
For the by-elections held during the 47th Australian Parliament, the AEC investigated 52 authorisation matters. Warning letters were sent in relation to identified authorisation breaches (63.5% of matters investigated). The following Table provides a breakdown of the breaches identified by communication type and event.
Authorisation investigations and breaches detected
Communication type |
Total Communications investigated |
Breaches detected during the Aston by-election |
Breaches detected during the Fadden by-election |
Breaches detected during the Dunkley by-election |
Breaches detected during the Cook by-election |
Total Breaches detected |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Social media |
14 |
2 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
11 |
Signs and print |
25 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
15 |
Other communications |
13 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
Total |
52 |
8 |
4 |
20 |
4 |
36 |
Of the 33 breaches detected, warnings letters were sent to people or entities to request action to rectify or remove improperly authorised communications. If the entity for was a first-time participant, further educational information was included in the letter.
For more information on the authorisation breaches identified for the by-elections held during the 47th Australian Parliament, the person or entities contacted and the outcomes see this Table.
The AEC investigated 414 authorisation matters between 30 March and 31 October 2023 (47.6% related to print media communications; 32.4% cent related to social media communications). Warning letters were sent in relation to 181 identified authorisation breaches (44% of matters investigated). The following Table provides a breakdown of the breaches identified by communication type.
Referendum authorisation investigations and breaches detected
Communication type |
Communications investigated |
Breaches detected |
---|---|---|
Social media |
134 |
72 |
Signs and print |
197 |
94 |
Other communications |
83 |
15 |
Total |
414 |
181 |
*Please note:
For more information on the authorisation breaches identified at the referendum, the person or entities contacted and the outcomes see this Table.
The AEC investigated 900 electoral communications complaints from 11 April 2022 (issue of writs) to 23 June 2022 (return of writs). 826 of these complaints related to the authorisation of electoral communications (56% related to print media communications; 22.4% cent related to social media communications).
Warning letters were sent in relation to 180 identified authorisation breaches (21.8% of matters investigated). The following Table provides a breakdown of the breaches identified by communication type.
2022 Federal Election authorisation investigations and breaches detected
Communication type |
Communications investigated |
Breaches detected |
---|---|---|
Social media |
185 |
69 |
Signs and print |
462 |
98 |
Other communications |
179 |
13 |
Total |
826 |
180 |
Of the 180 breaches detected, warnings letters were sent to people or entities to request action to rectify or remove improperly authorised communications. If the entity for was a first-time participant, further educational information was included in the letter.
For more information on the authorisation breaches identified at the 2022 Federal Election, the person or entities contacted and the outcomes see this Table.
In the event of an alleged contravention of Part XX or XXA of the Electoral Act, the AEC may, as an alternative to court proceedings, accept an enforceable undertaking given by the person who is alleged to have committed the contravention in accordance with Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers (Standard Provisions) Act 2014 (Regulatory Powers Act).
An enforceable undertaking is a legally binding agreement between the AEC and the person who gives the undertaking. Once accepted by the AEC, the enforceable undertaking obliges the person to carry out specific activities outlined in the enforceable undertaking.
Enforceable Undertakings that have been accepted by the AEC are published on the Transparency Register and outlined in the below Table.
Enforceable undertakings
Name of party |
Date of acceptance |
Legislative provisions |
Enforceable undertaking |
---|---|---|---|
Senator Pauline Hanson as party agent for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation |
15 June 2021 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – section 317(1) |
Pauline Lee Hanson – Enforceable undertaking [PDF - 802KB] |
Ms Kim Swanson |
3 March 2021 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – sections 304 and 309 |
Kim Swanson – Enforceable undertaking [PDF - 369KB] |
Mr Christopher James |
26 February 2021 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – sections 304 and 309 |
Christopher James – Enforceable undertaking [PDF - 389KB] |
Mr Tony Pecora |
10 February 2021 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – sections 304 and 309 |
Tony Pecora – Enforceable undertaking [PDF - 378KB] |
Ms Briony Davis as financial controller for EMILY’s List |
21 October 2022 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – sections 134AEA(1), 316(5) and 317 |
Briony Davis – Enforceable undertaking [PDF – 262KB] |
The Electoral Commissioner (or a delegate) may declare an elector reasonably suspected of voting more than once in the same election or referendum as a ‘designated elector’ under section 202AH(1) of the Electoral Act . This declaration can be made whether or not the elector has been convicted of a multiple voting offence under section 339(1A) or (1C) of theElectoral Actor section 130(1A) or (1C) of the Referendum Act.
Designated electors
Event | Number of declared designated electors |
---|---|
2019 federal election |
1287 |
2022 federal election |
37 |
Aston by-election |
1 |
2023 referendum |
TBC |
Total |
1325 |
The Electoral Commission, and ‘candidates’ in an election, are able to seek an injunction under section 383 of the Electoral Act against any conduct that is contravening or would contravene the Electoral Act. A court ordered injunction can prohibit certain conduct or to require certain conduct to be performed.
If an injunction is granted against a person, failure to comply with the injunction order may constitute contempt of court, for which the Federal Court can order arrest and detention.
There are civil penalties for the offences in Parts XX and XXA of the Electoral Act. Section 384A of the Electoral Act provides that civil penalty provisions are enforceable under Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers Act. These offences include:
The Electoral Commissioner may apply to a relevant court for an order that a person, who is alleged to have contravened a civil penalty provision, pay the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty.
Pecuniary penalty orders are published on the Federal Court’s Digital Law Library and outlined in following Table.
Civil actions
Matter | Date of Order |
Legislative provisions |
Judgment |
---|---|---|---|
Electoral Commissioner v Futter [2021] FCA 876 |
29 July 2021 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – section 304 and 309 |
|
Electoral Commissioner v Wharton (No 3) [2021] FCA 742 |
1 June 2021 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – sections 304 and 309 |
|
Australian Electoral Commission v Craig Kelly [2024] |
27 July 2023 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – section 321D (5) |
|
Electoral Commissioner of the Australian Electoral Commission v Laming (No 2) [2023] FCA 917 |
9 August 2023 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – section 321D(5) |
|
Electoral Commissioner v McQuestin [2024] FCA 287 |
26 March 2024 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) – sections 314B, 321B, 321C, 321D, 384A |
Parts VIII, XV, XVA, XVI, XX, XXA and XXI of the Electoral Act establish the following electoral offences:
Compulsory enrolment requires all Australian citizens aged 18 years to be enrolled on the Commonwealth electoral roll. British subjects who were enrolled on 25 January 1984 are also entitled to remain on the electoral roll. Under section 101 of the Electoral Act, an eligible individual who fails to enrol to vote may be issued a fine not exceeding 1 penalty unit.
More on enrolment.
It is an offence under section 245 of the Electoral Act if the elector fails to vote at an election without a valid and sufficient reason for that failure. Electors who fail to vote will be sent a penalty notice seeking the confirmation whether the elector voted, has a valid and sufficient reason for not voting, or failing that pays an administrative penalty of $20.
Where an elector fails to do any of these things, the elector may be prosecuted in accordance with section 245(15) of the Electoral Act.
More on compulsory voting.
More on the Commonwealth electoral roll.
It an offence under section 189B of the Electoral Act to obtain the information about postal vote applicants without a permitted purpose. Senate or House of Representative candidates and registered political parties can be provided a list of postal vote applicants for the purposes listed in section 189B.
The Electoral Act requires that scrutineers must not interfere with voters, or attempt to influence any voter within a polling place and must not exhibit or leave any printed material that directs, instructs or is intended to influence an elector on how to vote. Scrutineers must not disclose any knowledge or information they have acquired about how an elector has voted. The penalty for misconduct by scrutineers is 6 months imprisonment or 10 penalty units, or both.
More on the role of scrutineers
With one limited exception the Electoral Act does not regulate truth in electoral advertising. Section 329(1) of the Electoral Act makes it an offence to print, publish or distribute, or cause, permit or authorise to be printed, published or distributed, any matter or thing that is likely to mislead or deceive an elector in relation to the casting of a vote. The maximum penalty for a contravention of section 329(1) is a fine not exceeding 100 penalty units or imprisonment for a period not exceeding three years, or both, for a person; or a fine not exceeding 500 penalty units for a body corporate.
More information on misleading or deceptive publications.
The Electoral Act also lists a range of other criminal offences including bribery in relation to voting or interfering with a voter attempting to vote.
More information on polling place and other offences can be found on our website here and in the Electoral Act.
The AEC may refer a person engaging in activity that may breach an offence to the AFP for investigation. The AFP may then refer the matter to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions for consideration, in accordance with the Commonwealth Prosecution Policy, as to whether a prosecution is initiated.
Criminal investigations of contraventions, or possible contraventions of electoral offences can be found here on our website. Prosecutions of criminal offences are outlined in the following Table.
Name of Matter |
Date of Report |
Legislative provisions |
Investigation Report |
---|---|---|---|
Black Bull QLD Pty Ltd |
20 December 2018 |
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – |
|
R v Cheng FAN | 2 June 2022 | Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 – Breach of section 329 |
AEC Statement: Sentencing of Mr Cheng Fan |
2022 Federal Election – Failure to Vote | 05 April 2024 | Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 - section 245 (15) | 226 electors convicted and fined |